Journal: Volume 31, No. 2, 2026
Pages: 11 – 26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62660/bcstu/2.2026.11
189 Views

Method for detecting the results of digital image cloning in post-processing

Svitlana Hryhorenko, Oleksandr Yevseiev, Mykola Voronov
Received 11.12.2025
Revised 20.03.2026
Accepted 18.05.2026
Published 26.06.2026

Abstract

The relevance of this study is driven by the increasing number of digital image falsification cases and the widespread use of fragment cloning as a common manipulation technique, which poses serious challenges to information security. The aim of this research was to develop and experimentally validate a robust method for detecting digital image cloning under post-processing conditions based on the analysis of the minimum mean block difference matrix, enabling reliable identification and spatial localisation of cloned regions and their original prototypes. The proposed method was based on iterative interval bisection combined with binary cross-analysis of block differences and was implemented in the Matlab environment. The experimental framework included modelling additive Gaussian, multiplicative and impulse noise, JPEG compression, spatial filtering, and combined distortions. Visual fidelity was quantitatively evaluated using the peak signal-to-noise ratio with a threshold value of signal-to-noise ratio PSNR > 37 dB. Computational experiments were conducted on central regions of digital images with a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels. Cloned regions occupied less than 0.85% of the image area, typically ranging from 0.098% to 0.39%, while smaller cloned areas below 0.098% were also considered. The analysis was performed on a randomly selected single colour channel using blockbased processing. In the absence of post-processing distortions, the global minimum of the minimum mean block difference function reached zero, resulting in maximum detection performance with a true positive rate of 100%. False positive rate evaluation on original images yielded values of 11%, 7.5%, and 3% for block sizes of 16, 24, and 32, respectively. Although the proposed approach demonstrates high detection sensitivity, the results indicate limitations in suppressing false positives compared to some state-of-the-art methods, highlighting the need for further optimisation

Keywords

References

  1. Abir, N.A.M., Abd Warif, N. B., & Zainal, N. (2021) An evaluationofpatch match-based copy-move forgery detection (CMFD) onsocialmedia images. In 2021 IEEE international conference on artificial intelligence in engineering and technology (IICAIET) (pp. 1-6). Kota Kinabalu: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IICAIET51634.2021.9573571.
  2. Akram, A., Arfan, M., Rashid, J., Mahmood, K., & Ghani, A. (2025) Advanced digital image forensics: A hybrid framework for copy-move forgery detection in multimedia security. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 70 (5), 1801-1823. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.70076.
  3. Ali, S.S., Ganapathi, I.I., Vu, N.-S., Ali, S.D., Saxena, N., & Werghi, N. (2022) Image forgery detection using deep learning by recompressing images. Electronics, 11(3), article number 403. doi: 10.3390/electronics11030403.
  4. Aloraini, M., Sharifzadeh, M., & Schonfeld, D. (2021) Sequential and patch analyses for object removal video forgery detection and localization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 31(3), 917-930. doi: 10.1109/tcsvt.2020.2993004.
  5. Bertojo, L., Néraud, C., & Puech, W. (2022) A very fast copy-move forgery detection method for 4K ultra HD images. Frontiers in Signal Processing, 2, article number 906304. doi: 10.3389/frsip.2022.906304.
  6. Duszejko, P., Walczyna, T., & Piotrowski, Z, (2025) Detection of manipulations in digital images: A review of passive and active methods utilizing deep learning. Applied Sciences, 15(2), 881. doi: 10.3390/app15020881.
  7. Gani, G., & Qadir, F. (2020) A robust copy-move forgery detection technique based on discrete cosine transform and cellular automata. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 54, article number 102510. doi: 10.1016/j. jisa.2020.102510.
  8. Ghai, A., Kumar, P., & Gupta, S. (2024) A deep-learning-based image forgery detection framework for controlling the spread of misinformation. Information Technology & People, 37(2), 966-997. doi: 10.1108/ITP-10-20200699.
  9. Grygorenko, S.N. (2016) Development of a method for detecting cloning in digital images under conditions of additional disruptive actions. Legal, Regulatory and Metrological Support for the Information Protection System in Ukraine, 1(31), 85-98.
  10. Haiwei, W., Zhou, J., Tian, J., & Liu, J. (2022) Robust image forgery detection over online social network shared images. In IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) (pp. 13430-13439). New Orleans: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01308.
  11. Hamza, А. (2022) How to make salt pepper noise own code. Retrieved from https://surl.li/empafc.
  12. Hosny, K.M., Mortda, A.M., Lashin, N.A., & Fouda, M.M. (2023) A new method to detect splicing image forgery using convolutional neural network. Applied Sciences, 13(3), article number 1272. doi: 10.3390/app13031272.
  13. Jain, A. (2024) Salt and pepper noise and how to remove it in machine learning. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/ nezlap.
  14. Jaiswal, A.K., & Srivastava, R. (2022) Detection of copy-move forgery in digital image using multi-scale, multi-stage deep learning model. Neural Processing Letters, 54(1), 75-100. doi: 10.1007/s11063-021-10620-9.
  15. Jiao, L.-X., Ng, K.-W. & Tong, H.-L. (2025) A comprehensive review of keypoint-based copy-move forgery detection: Challenges and advances. IEEE Access, 13, 180941-180952. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3618716.
  16. Kadam, K.D., Ahirrao, S., & Kotecha, K. (2022) Efficient approach towards detection and identification of copy move and image splicing forgeries using mask R-CNN with mobilenet V1. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1, article number 6845326. doi: 10.1155/2022/6845326.
  17. Khalil, A.H., Ghalwash, A.Z., Elsayed, H.A., Salama, G.I. & Ghalwash, H.A. (2023) Enhancing digital image forgery detection using transfer learning. IEEE Access, 11, 91583-91594. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3307357.
  18. Koul, S., Kumar, M., Khurana, S.S., Mushtaq, F. ,& Kumar, K. (2022) An efficient approach for copy-move image forgery detection using convolution neural network. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(8), 11259-11277. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-11974-5.
  19. Kundu, R. (2022) Image processing: Techniques, types & applications. Retrieved from https://www.v7labs.com/ blog/image-processing-guide.
  20. Li, F., Pei, Z., Wei, W., Li, J., & Qin, C. (2022) Image forgery detection using tamper-guided dual self-attention network with multiresolution hybrid feature. Security and Communication Networks, 1, article number 1090307. doi: 10.1155/2022/1090307.
  21. Lumenci. (2024) Digital image processing (DIP): A beginner’s guide. Retrieved from https://surli.cc/qwhewc.
  22. Mehrjardi, F.Z., Latif, A.M., Zarchi, M.S., & Sheikhpour, R. (2023) A survey on deep learning-based image forgery detection. Pattern Recognition, 144, article number 109778. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109778.
  23. Shehin, A.U., & Sankar, D. (2024) Copy move forgery detection and localisation robust to rotation using block based discrete cosine transform and eigenvalues. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 99, article number 104075. doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2024.104075.
  24. Shi, C., Chen, L., Wang, C., Zhou, X., & Qin, Z. (2023). Review of image forensic techniques based on deep learning. Mathematics, 11(14), article number 3134. doi: 10.3390/math11143134.
  25. Suresh, G., & Rao, C.S. (2022) Detection and localization of copy-moveforgery in digital images: Review and challenges. International Journal of Image and Graphics, 23(4), article numer 2350025. doi: 10.1142/ S0219467823500250.
  26. Tahaoglu, G., Uluas, G., & Ustubioglu, B. (2021) A new approach for localization of copy-move forgery in digital images. In 44th international conference on telecommunications and signal processing (TSP) (pp. 183-186). Brno: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/TSP52935.2021.9522680.
  27. Taneja, M.E.N., Mishra, G.S., & Bhardwaj, D. (2025) Unmasking anti-forensic techniques: A DCNN-driven approach to uncover contrast enhancement and median filtering detection. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 70(6), 2324-2337. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.70161.
  28. Xie, H., Ni, J., & Shi, Y.Q. (2022). Dual-domain generative adversarial network for digital image operation anti-forensics. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32(3), 1701-1706. doi: 10.1109/ TCSVT.2021.3068294.
  29. Yang, J., Liang, Z., Gan, Y., & Zhong, J. (2021). A novel copy-move forgery detection algorithm via two-stage filtering. Digital Signal Processing, 113, article number 103032. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103032.

Suggested citation

Hryhorenko, S., Yevseiev, O., & Voronov, M. (2026). Method for detecting the results of digital image cloning in post-processing. Bulletin of Cherkasy State Technological University, 31(2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.62660/bcstu/2.2026.11