Cognitive model of risk management by technological complex of continuous type
Abstract
The article discusses the main issues of risk management of the continuous type technological complexes. In the new concept the uncertainties and risks deserve special attention. In conventional control logic uncertainty regarded as inevitable losses that may be visible or hidden. Manager tries to avoid or to minimize the uncertainty and risks through detailed planning, regulation and precise execution of the plan. With the new approach to the management of uncertainty is explicitly recognized as part of the real world and regarded as the most important part of management and planning. The purpose of this article is to develop a cognitive model of risk management of the continuous type technological complexes in the food, chemical and others industry. After analyzing and considering the specialty of the continuous type technological complexes, the authors highlighted the internal risks that directly affect the technological component of profit. The authors propose a mathematical model of risks identification of the continuous type technological complexes, which directly affect the technological component of profit. Also, the authors propose a fuzzy cognitive model of risk management of the continuous type technological complexes in food industry. This model makes it possible to identify the sources of risk events in the external and internal environment of the company, the degree of their effect on business performance, as well as the definition of actions to avoid risks
Keywords
continuous type technological complexes, risk, risk management, cognitive model
References
- Arkhangelskiy, V.I., Bogaenko, I.V., Grabovskiy, G.G., Riumshin, N.A. (2005). Intehririvannoe upravlenie proizvodstvom: orhanizatsionnye i tekhnolohicheskie aspekty menedzhmenta predpriiatii. Kyiv: Tekhnika, 328 s.
- Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 11, pp. 65–67.
- Kuntsevych, V.M. (2006). Upravlinnia v umovakh nevyznachenosti: harantovani rezultaty v zadachakh upravlinnia ta identyfikatsii: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 264 s.
- Kuznetsov, A.P., Kulinich, A.A., Markovskiy, A.V. (2006). Analiz vliianii pri upravlenii slabostrukturirovannymi sytuatsiiami na osnove kohnityvnykh kart. In: Abramova, N.A., Ginsberg, K.S., Novikov, D.A. (Eds.). Chelovecheskiy faktor v upravlenii. Moscow: KomKniga, pp. 313–344.
- Ladaniuk, A., Prokopenko, T., Reshetiuk, V. (2014). The model of strategic management of organizational and technical systems, taking into account risk-based cognitive approach. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Agriculture (Agricultural and Forest Engineering), 63, pp. 97–104.
- Ladaniuk, A.P., Shumihai, D.A., Boiko, R.O. (2013). Sytuatsionnoe koordinirovanie podsistem tekhnologicheskikh kompleksov nepreryvnogo tipa. Problemy upravleniia i informatiki, 4, pp. 117–122.
- Novikov, D., Ashimov, A., Sultanov, B., Adilov, Z., Borovskiy, Y., Alshanov, R., Ashimov, A. (2013). Macroeconomic analysis and parametric control of a national economy. New York: Springer, 288 p.
- Prokopenko, T.A., Ladaniuk, A.P. (2014). Informatsionnaia model upravleniia tekhnologicheskimi kompleksami nepreryvnogo tipa v klasse organizatsionno-tekhnicheskikh system. Problemy upravleniia i informatiki, 5, pp. 64–70.
- Prokopenko, T.O., Ladaniuk, A.P. (2015). Informatsiini tekhnolohii upravlinnia orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichnymy systemamy: monohrafiia. Cherkasy: Vertykal, vydavets Kandych S.H., 224 s.
- Sikora, L.S. (2009). Kohnityvni modeli ta lohika operatyvnoho upravlinnia v ierarkhichnykh intehrovanykh systemakh v umovakh ryzyku: monohrafiia. Lviv: TsSD "EBTES", 432 s.