Journal: Volume 31, No. 1, 2026
Pages: 73 – 84
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62660/bcstu/1.2026.73
223 Views

Conceptual information model and methods for developing a personalised information service for researchers

Volodymyr Liubchak, Maksym Shovkoplias
Received 27.10.2025
Revised 09.02.2026
Accepted 16.03.2026
Published 08.04.2026

Abstract

Modern scientific activity takes place under conditions of growing information volumes and fragmented digital infrastructures. Researchers are compelled to rely on multiple independent platforms – such as search engines, bibliographic managers, analytical tools, and academic communication services – which complicates workflow organisation, causes redundancy, and reduces research efficiency. The purpose of this study was to develop a conceptual model of a personalised information service for researchers, capable of integrating search, analytical, bibliographic, and communication functions within a unified adaptive environment. The methodology involved information modelling, integration of open scientific data via application programming interfaces, and the formalisation of a user profile for the automated selection of relevant services. The resulting model was formalised as an informational quintuple F = (P, S, D, I, U), where P represents the user profile module, S – the service selection module, D – the data integration module, I – the interface subsystem, and U – the analytics and adaptation subsystem. The user profile P was defined as a vector structure comprising theme-specific attributes, tool preferences, and languages. For each external service Si, relevance R (Si, P) was computed using a normalisation function fₙₒᵣₘ and a similarity metric Sim, enabling the construction of a personalised service configuration. A prototype implemented using Flutter and Firebase demonstrated the model’s practical capacity to reduce the time required to locate relevant information and to enhance overall research productivity. The proposed model can serve as a foundation for adaptive digital platforms that promote open science and foster interdisciplinary collaboration

Keywords

References

  1. Adewale, T. (2022). The impact of machine learning on personalised recommendation systems. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386337230.
  2. Carrera-Rivera, A., Larrinaga, F., Lasa, G., Martinez-Arellano, G., & Unamuno, G. (2024). AdaptUI: A framework for the development of adaptive user interfaces in smart product-service systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 34, 1929-1980. doi: 10.1007/s11257-024-09414-0.
  3. Chen, J., Dong, H., Wang, X., Feng, F., Wang, M., & He, X. (2020). Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.03240.
  4. Fei, Y., Ruel, L., Ryan, T., Qian, X., Hong, C., Stan, K., Xuan, N.B., Anna, K., & Javed, M. (2020). Innovative UX methods for information access based on interdisciplinary approaches: Practical lessons from academia and industry. Data and Information Management, 4(1), 74-80. doi: 10.2478/dim-2020-0004.
  5. Ferri, P. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on scientific collaboration: Setting the scene for a future research agenda. In Proceeding of the Eu-SPRI conference «Challenging Science and innovation policy». Utrecht: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University.
  6. Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: Trends, benefits, and challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), article number 84. doi: 10.3390/ mti9080084.
  7. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), article number 1216. doi: 10.3390/ educsci13121216.
  8. Hussein, S., & Maan, N. (2023). UACA: Unified access control approach for heterogeneous database based-on service data object. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 9, 26-40. doi: 10.47577/ technium.v9i.8686.
  9. Ko, H., Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). A survey of recommendation systems: Recommendation models, techniques, and application fields. Electronics, 11(1), article number 141. doi: 10.3390/electronics11010141.
  10. Kreutz, C.K., & Schenkel, R. (2022). Scientific paper recommendation systems: A literature review of recent publications. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 23, 335-369. doi: 10.1007/s00799-022-00339-w.
  11. Li, S., & Li, D. (2025). Research on personalised learning recommendation system based on machine learning algorithm. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 26(1), 432-440. doi: 10.12694/scpe.v26i1.3844.
  12. Masciari, E., Umair, A., & Ullah, M.H. (2024). A systematic literature review on AI-based recommendation systems and their ethical considerations. IEEE Access, 12, 121223-121241. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3451054.
  13. Nikiforova, L., Dohtieva, I., & Zharinov, S. (2025). Specificity of the design of the development of an information resource and an electronic register of scientific professional publications in the context of digitalisation of the scientific field. Innovation and Sustainability, 4, 62-75. doi: 10.31649/ins.2024.4.62.75.
  14. Petryna, D., Kornuta, V., & Kornuta, O. (2024). Using neural network tools to accelerate the development of Web interfaces. Information Technologies and Computer Engineering, 60(2), 42-50. doi: 10.31649/1999-9941-202460-2-42-50.
  15. Putri, C.A., Syaifuddin, A., Rohman, N., Aziz, A., & Ponijan, R.M.P. (2025). Optimizing the use of digital libraries in basic education. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 1-13. doi: 10.51276/edu.v6i1.940.
  16. Riordan, A., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: Systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, article number 100215. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215.
  17. Roy, D., & Dutta, M. (2022). A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems. Journal of Big Data, 9, article number 59. doi: 10.1186/s40537-022-00592-5.
  18. Shovkoplias, M.O., & Liubchak, V.O. (2024). Review of models and methods for individual customisation of a scientist’s information service. Information Technology: Computer Science, Software Engineering and Cyber Security, 2, 88-96. doi: 10.32782/IT/2024-2-11.
  19. Umbach, M. (2024). Open Science and the impact of Open Access, Open Data, and FAIR publishing principles on data-driven academic research: Towards ever more transparent, accessible, and reproducible academic output? Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 40(1), 59-70. doi: 10.3233/SJI-240021.
  20. Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2025). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001.
  21. Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252(A), article number 124167. doi: 10.1016/j. eswa.2024.124167.
  22. Zhao, N., Wei, C., Zhang, X., & Li, J. (2025). The role of AI in facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration: Evidence from AlphaFold. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.13234.

Suggested citation

Liubchak, V., & Shovkoplias, M. (2026). Conceptual information model and methods for developing a personalised information service for researchers. Bulletin of Cherkasy State Technological University, 31(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.62660/bcstu/1.2026.73