Technology of expert determination of technological security of housing in multi-storey buildings

The low awareness of the population about the level of technogenic security of housing in multi-storey buildings and, as a result, the inadequacy of its price and security characteristics determine the relevance of the development of technology and information-consulting support of the subjects of real estate market (construction and insurance companies, residents, firefighters). The determination of the level of technogenic safety is one of its important elements.Existing approaches to the definition of the level of technogenic safety do not allow an objective assessment of the safety index for the inhabitants. They take into account the number of internal factors and external characteristics, and do not take into account the priorities of these factors, both empirically and analytically. Therefore, for the solution of this problem, the technology of expert determination of anthropogenic safety level is proposed. The technology of expert determination of the level of technogenic safety is based on experts’ conclusions. The competence of experts can be determined by the decision-maker or by the axiom of unboundedness. As a result, experts’ conclusions obtained on the priority of factors will allow to identify the dependence on existing approaches and to establish an indicator of the level of technogenic security analytically. The proposed technology and pilot studies are an important step towards improving the process of informational and analytical provision of real estate market subjects in the direction of determining the level of technogenic security of housing in multi-storey residential buildings. The article deals with the problem of determining the level of technogenic security of housing in high-rise buildings. It is proposed to use the expert evaluation, elements of hierarchy analysis method and fuzzy set theory to determine the priority of the factors that influence on the security of housing and are arguments of corresponding target function. The peculiarities of individual and group expert evaluation are determined